X wants your location. Truth wants your anonymity.
Have you noticed the new conversation unfolding on X? The idea that every account should display the country it comes from, as if your thoughts need a national stamp to be considered valid.
On the surface it looks harmless. Most people will shrug and say it is only a small label, only a tiny change, only a bit more transparency. But anyone who understands how control works knows that it never arrives all at once. It arrives in steps. Quiet ones. Acceptable ones. Steps that feel too minor to resist. Until one day you look back and realise you have walked straight into a world you never agreed to enter.
This is one of those steps. A single country label. A single piece of identity. A single suggestion that your speech should come with a passport attached. It seems innocent, but it is directional. Once you accept one form of identity tagging, another follows. And another. And another. Each framed as safety. Each framed as clarity. Each framed as a harmless improvement. Until eventually the truth becomes something you are only allowed to speak if your credentials say you may.
Vitalik looks at this idea and sees an engineering experiment. He imagines it will help in the short term. He predicts it will be spoofed in the medium term by people renting identities, faking locations, buying phone numbers, disguising themselves through layers of tech. He sees the technical challenge and the structural weakness. He is focused on the machinery.
Richard Heart sees something else entirely. He sees what happens when the world replaces free speech with “speech,” a curated version of expression that must be tethered to identity. He sees the moment honesty becomes obedience. He sees the very old tactic of attaching consequences to words, not by banning them outright, but by making you responsible for every vibration of your voice. Not responsible in the moral sense. Responsible in the punishable sense.
And as someone who has walked through enough uncomfortable truths to recognise the shape of control when it appears, I see the pattern too. When you talk openly about chemicals in the food that quietly demasculinise men, people get nervous. When you point to digital IDs merging with financial systems, people shift in their seats. When you speak about central bank digital currencies and the way they will track the citizen, not the currency, people call it dramatic. But nothing dramatic ever begins dramatically. It begins with steps that everyone accepts. Steps that feel harmless. Steps that make you feel like resisting them would be unreasonable.
This is how freedom is shaped. Not by force. By small agreements.
In vino veritas. In wine there is truth. Wine removes fear. Wine quiets inhibition. Wine lowers the walls that the world builds around honesty. But online we do not have wine. We have anonymity. And anonymity is the last wine we have.
People speak their truth when they are not afraid of punishment. People reveal what they really think when their job is not tied to their opinion. People share what they see in the world when their address is not only one click away. That is why anonymity exists. Not to hide evil. But to give truth oxygen. To let ideas stand without the shadow of retaliation.
Free speech dies the moment it requires identity. Not because identity is harmful, but because identity gives power a handle to hold. If speech demands a passport, a face, a location, a record, then it is no longer free speech. It is supervised speech. And supervised speech becomes performance. People say what they think they are allowed to say, not what they know is true.
This is why the location debate on X matters far more than people realise. It is not about a label on a profile. It is about the future direction of the entire digital world. Once identity tagging becomes normal, the next step becomes easier to introduce. And then the next. And then the next. It builds itself through the appearance of safety. Until one day you wake up and discover you are not speaking freely at all. You are speaking within parameters.
Vitalik is focused on the mechanics. Richard is focused on the principle. And the principle is this. Speech is free or it is not speech. If you need permission to speak, you are not speaking. You are performing. You are conforming. You are surviving.
I have lived long enough and seen enough to know that truth only thrives where fear cannot choke it. This is why I speak the way I do. This is why I refuse to soften the edges. This is why I will talk about contamination in food, demasculation of men, centralised currencies, the takeover of crypto, and every uncomfortable truth in between. Not because it is easy. Because anything left unsaid becomes something we silently consent to.
In vino veritas. And anonymity is our wine. It is the last protection we have against a world that wants your identity before it wants your opinion. And as long as I have a voice, I will use it. Because truth becomes dangerous only when people stop telling it.
Veritya Thalassa
🔷 PulseChain Nexus+
A professional intelligence hub for serious crypto participants.
If you want to understand what is happening inside crypto and at the edges of the world beyond it
if you prefer clarity over noise
and truth over packaging
Nexus+ is designed for you.
Membership Options
- $20 per month
- $180 per year (annual subscribers receive a reduced rate)
What You Gain
🔹 Nexus+ Intelligence
Professional-grade analysis focused on decentralisation, market structure and global shifts.
🔹 Guardians Telegram Access
A private environment for members who value integrity, sovereignty and informed discussion.
🔹 Depth, not distraction
Insight that helps you see the broader landscape while everyone else reacts to headlines.
Nexus+ exists for people who take this space seriously and want to stay ahead of what is unfolding.
👉 Join here