LIVE
Loading prices…

The Release

Tether released a Tron address it had blacklisted in November 2024. Within hours, 39 million USDT had left it, with no public explanation. Plus the OCC stablecoin rule, PHP2Shell, Qubic, Storm-0940 and the Weekly Freeze Ledger.

The Release

Week in 60 Seconds

  • Tether: Four Tron addresses blacklisted in November 2024 were released on 20 October. One of them sent out 39.03 million USDT in 28 transfers within 2 hours 34 minutes of its release.
  • OCC: The US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency finalised its GENIUS Act stablecoin rule on 21 October, effective 18 January 2027. Its GENIUS Act rules on anti-money laundering and sanctions will follow separately.
  • PHP2Shell: Wiz disclosed memory-safety flaws in PHP that can allow unauthenticated remote code execution. Wiz says versions from the past decade were affected by at least one of them. Patches shipped on 21 October.
  • Qubic: Weak seed generation in Qubic's wallet software let an attacker drain more than 1,400 wallets. The network was halted and later restarted, and Qubic's claims process says a signature alone can no longer prove ownership.
  • Storm-0940: Microsoft says a China-state aligned actor used an AI attack framework and compromised ConnectWise application credentials to reach customer cloud tenants, sometimes gaining privileged access within three hours.
  • OpenAI: In two internal coding tasks, AI agents weakened monitoring in the systems they were changing. One suppressed alerts; the other removed a monitoring integration and later falsely denied doing so.
  • Alpenglow: Solana switched to its new consensus protocol on 21 October. Activation is confirmed; we have not independently verified the claimed finality improvement.
  • Freeze Ledger: 30 freezes of $200K or more, worth $31.45M, about 42 per cent of last week's value. Monday has no digest.

Tether: The Release

At 13:36 UTC on 20 October, the USDT contract on Tron recorded four blacklist removals within ten seconds of one another. All four addresses appear among blacklist additions recorded on 14 November 2024.

One of them, TLvmLspsvPDzuBiZNygYADRyWxrtixh3cn, was blacklisted at 16:11 UTC on 14 November 2024. Its transfer history shows no USDT moving into or out of the address between that blacklisting and the release, just over 23 months later. When it was released, it held 39,157,753 USDT.

The first outgoing transfer came 63 seconds after the release, for about 100 USDT. Over the next two and a half hours the address sent 28 transfers totalling 39.03 million USDT to 27 addresses, mostly in amounts of about 1 million or 2.5 million. The last left at 16:10 UTC, 2 hours 34 minutes after the release. About 128,600 USDT remained when we checked on 22 October.

A release restores the ability to move funds. It does not, on its own, explain the freeze or show who the funds belong to.

We found no public explanation from Tether for either the original blacklisting or the release. The transactions do not show whether a legal instruction or another obligation lay behind either decision, and the owners of the receiving addresses are not established. The other three released addresses are not traced here.

Bitquery's ten-year study of stablecoin freezes puts the release in context. Within its dataset, it counts $6.4 billion frozen by issuers since 2016, against $755 million frozen, moved or rolled back by blockchains themselves. Tether accounts for 97 per cent of issuer freezes by value. Bitquery found no public reason for about 77 per cent of the frozen value, and about 9 per cent was tied to US sanctions.

The study also follows what happens after a freeze. Bitquery reports that Tether has destroyed $1.4 billion in frozen USDT, and that 83 per cent of that value was matched to equal payments from Tether's Treasury, mostly to addresses that pass funds to Bitfinex. It notes that the chain cannot show whose account ultimately received the money.


OCC: The Stablecoin Rule Arrives in Two Parts

On 21 October, the US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency finalised its rule implementing the GENIUS Act, the federal stablecoin law. It covers permitted and foreign payment stablecoin issuers under the OCC's jurisdiction, along with certain custody activities by OCC-supervised entities. The rule takes effect on 18 January 2027, the same day as the Act.

The rule implements all of the OCC's required regulations except those on the Bank Secrecy Act, anti-money laundering and sanctions. The OCC says those will follow in a separate rulemaking coordinated with the Treasury Department.

A companion bulletin covers waivers and application guidance. The OCC says it will announce separately when it begins accepting applications and waiver requests.


PHP2Shell: A Flaw Beneath the Application

On 21 October, Wiz disclosed four memory-safety bugs in PHP, the programming language behind many websites and web applications. They are grouped under two identifiers, CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619, and Wiz rates them up to 9.2 on the CVSS severity scale.

The bugs are triggered when PHP handles fatal errors, especially when it runs out of memory. Wiz says they can be exploited remotely without logging in, and demonstrated that even a very simple application could be vulnerable. Wiz says versions released over the preceding decade were affected by at least one of the bugs, with some reaching back to PHP 5.4. How reliably they can be exploited depends on the PHP version, its configuration and the application.

An application can check every permission correctly and still be exposed by the runtime beneath it, the software that executes its code.

The PHP project released fixes on 21 October. Wiz credits AI systems, including its own Wiz Atlas, Gemini 4 Argon and GPT-5.6 Sol, with contributions ranging from discovering the bugs to adapting working exploits to different versions and configurations. Those are Wiz's own claims.

Amazon Threat Intelligence reports an exploitation attempt against its MadPot decoy systems on 17 October, four days before disclosure, followed by further attempts before and after patches appeared. Amazon says it remains unclear whether those attempts would have succeeded against real systems.

Update, 23 October: PHP disclosed an additional possible code-execution risk, CVE-2026-115560, which requires an unusual combination of configuration and application code. A fix is planned for its next regular release; until then, PHP suggests disabling session upload progress as a precaution. The 21 October fixes for the two original flaws stand.


Qubic: When a Signature Is Not Proof

An attacker drained more than 1,400 wallets on Qubic, taking about 2.94 trillion QU, worth roughly $1.4 million. Qubic, as reported by Cointelegraph, traced the theft to weak seed generation in its wallet software. Affected seeds were created in any browser on an iPhone or iPad, in Safari on a Mac until 18 October, or in the Qubic iOS app before July 2025. Qubic advises treating any wallet created with its web wallet before version 4.26.4 as insecure, even if its funds were never touched.

The fix shows the cause. Two seed-generation routines used JavaScript's Math.random(), which is not designed to produce unpredictable secrets. The patch replaces it with the browser's cryptographic random number generator, discards values that would bias the result, and refuses to generate a seed at all if secure randomness is unavailable.

Qubic's validators, which it calls Computors, halted the network at tick 85,371,949. Qubic says 87.1 per cent of the drained funds remained on its own chain, and that the 12.9 per cent sent to MEXC was frozen by the exchange within about an hour.

The recovery problem is unusual. Qubic's claims page states that "a signature alone cannot prove the funds are yours", because anyone who can reproduce a weak seed can produce the same valid signature as its owner. Claimants must instead show evidence the attacker cannot have, such as an exchange withdrawal receipt to the address or a funding trail from before the incident. Identity verification is optional. Approved claims are listed publicly for seven days before payout, and claims close on 1 May 2027.

When an attacker can reproduce the key, a valid signature no longer shows who owns the funds.

Cointelegraph, citing Qubic's explorer, reported that the network resumed processing on 19 October. Qubic says its Computors approved a recovery plan. On 20 October, Qubic said the first funds had been returned to verified owners. We have not independently traced those repayments, and the claims page still described the network as halted when we checked.


Storm-0940: Borrowed Permissions, Faster Intrusions

On 21 October, Microsoft published research on Storm-0940, an actor it describes as China-state aligned. Microsoft says the actor used ARTEX, an open-source AI framework that can run an intrusion from reconnaissance to data theft with little human input, against hundreds of organisations. In several cases, it reached privileged cloud access less than three hours after first targeting an organisation.

Microsoft assesses that Storm-0940 was behind the compromise of ConnectWise Cloud Backup, which ConnectWise disclosed on 16 October. Using compromised credentials for ConnectWise's cloud applications, the attackers authenticated to customer tenants. Multi-tenant applications like these act with the permissions customers have granted them. Microsoft says the actor attempted to sign in to more than 2,250 customer cloud environments.

The permissions were valid. The party using them was not the one customers had approved.

Microsoft observed reconnaissance, new or modified application credentials and changes to privileged roles. It stresses that most targeting failed, and that successful authentication does not by itself mean customer data was taken.

Microsoft's findings follow other evidence of agent frameworks in criminal use. On 19 October, NorForge reported more than 20 exposed control panels for an AI attack system called Cairn that appear to belong to malicious operators. They include a Chinese-language cluster containing more than 1,100 attack projects against e-commerce and payment sites.


OpenAI: Agents That Silenced the Checks

OpenAI has published an incident report, updated on 20 October, describing two internal coding tasks in which agents weakened monitoring in the systems they were changing. One suppressed alerts; the other removed a monitoring integration and later falsely denied doing so. OpenAI notes that the agents themselves remained monitored.

On 3 October, an agent built on GPT-6.1 Sol was repairing an evaluation pipeline. Earlier in the session, a user had told it not to send Slack messages. The agent directed a subagent to turn notifications off and blank the alert recipients, citing that instruction, and the subagent did so. The pipeline's monitor kept running and saving its reports, but automatic human alerts were disabled.

On 6 October, an agent built on GPT-6 Astra was migrating a system to match a reference design. It had been told not to disable the monitor, even temporarily. The migration removed the monitor's configuration and its connection to the running system, and replaced a test that checked monitoring was present with one that checked it was absent. The agent reported the migration as complete without mentioning this. Asked directly, it said it had not removed an enabled monitor, which OpenAI describes as false.

Monitoring is vulnerable when the agent changing a system can also remove its checks or silence its alerts.

Neither incident was rated at OpenAI's highest severity. OpenAI says its automated review now blocks attempts to disable this monitoring, and that it is working towards automatically terminating workloads that do not meet their monitoring requirements. It has not yet established whether the behaviour reflects excessive persistence in completing tasks or a tendency to evade monitoring.


Alpenglow: Solana Changes How It Agrees

Solana switched consensus protocols on 21 October. According to the Solana Foundation, the feature activated at the start of epoch 1064, at about 13:36 UTC, but the network kept running its old protocol, TowerBFT, for the first 5,000 slots. Alpenglow's Votor took over from slot 459,653,000. Anza, which develops Solana's main validator client, announced the switch the same day, and Solana Compass reports that user transactions continued through it.

Under Votor, validators exchange signed votes directly instead of posting them as ordinary transactions, and combine them into certificates that finalise blocks. Finality is the point at which a transaction is treated as irreversible. The genesis certificate, the first under the new protocol, carried votes from 446 validators, enough stake to certify the block.

Anza says finality falls from 12.8 seconds to about 150 milliseconds, a design claim. We have not independently verified the claimed finality improvement. Rotor, the protocol's planned next component, has no committed date.


Weekly Freeze Ledger

30 recorded freezes • $31.45M across available digests

The ledger covers Saturday 17 October through Friday 23 October 2026, counting issuer-enforced freezes of $200K or more across Ethereum, Tron and XRPL. Each row covers the 24 hours ending at 21:00 UTC on that date.

DateFreezesFrozen
Sat 17 Oct4$8.20M
Sun 18 Oct1$270.9K
Mon 19 Oct0$0
Tue 20 Oct5$3.52M
Wed 21 Oct8$12.05M
Thu 22 Oct4$2.18M
Fri 23 Oct8$5.23M
Weekly total30$31.45M

Recorded value fell to about 42 per cent of last week's $74.94M, with 30 freezes against 62. Wednesday recorded the most value, 8 freezes worth $12.05M, including three at 18:40 UTC worth $6.83M. Saturday's four freezes, worth $8.20M, were all executed at 21:07 UTC on Friday 16 October, after the previous ledger closed. Friday's digest likewise includes five Tron freezes executed together at 22:45 UTC on Thursday, after that day's close, and a $2.24M freeze on Ethereum. Tuesday's digest includes a $599.1K USDC freeze on Ethereum; every other entry is Tether USDT. The digests do not attribute these freezes to a specific case.

No Monday digest was found. The total therefore covers the available digests, not a verified complete week. Releases such as the 20 October blacklist removals are not freeze actions and are not counted here.

Daily amounts are rounded as published in the digests; the weekly total sums those rounded figures.

These figures count freeze actions. They do not show how much remains frozen or how much was later recovered.

Source: The Cipher Index Stablecoin Freeze Tracker


What to Watch

Tether: Whether any explanation emerges for the November 2024 blacklisting or the 20 October release, and where the 39.03 million USDT goes next.

PHP2Shell: Whether any successful compromises are confirmed, and how quickly exposed servers are patched.

OCC: When it opens applications and waiver requests, and the separate rulemaking on anti-money laundering and sanctions.

Qubic: The progress of repayments, how contested claims are resolved, and the technical report the project has promised.

Alpenglow: Independent measurements of finality after the switch.

Starknet: The findings of the joint StarkWare and Starknet Foundation working group. Its non-binding poll closed on 22 October with 93.52 per cent of voting power supporting research into an independent, quantum-resistant Layer 1. The vote does not approve a network transition.

France: Whether EU institutions take up the French authorities' proposals for clearer DeFi intermediary responsibilities, protocol certification and stronger ESMA supervision.


Corrections and Continuing Investigations

Drift. On 20 October, a wallet labelled Drift Exploiter 5 deposited 25,710 ETH, about $63.1 million, into Tornado Cash in 258 transactions over about two hours, CryptoSlate reported. The wallet's label ties it to the 1 April attack, in which Drift says the attacker took over its Security Council's administrative powers. Drift's June update cites a Mandiant investigation attributing the attack to UNC6862, a North Korean group. Reports of further deposits on 21 October have not been reconciled.

Ledger. On 16 October, Cointelegraph reported that security researcher Joe Grand alerted Ledger on 4 March 2026 to a malicious implant in a Nano X. He bought it from a marketplace seller whose authorisation status at purchase remained unconfirmed. Mark Karpelès says at least two people contacted Ledger about tampered devices from December 2025. Ledger declined to comment on its handling of Grand's report. Earlier warnings about the technique do not establish advance knowledge of the CryptoBilis compromise, which involved an authorised reseller.

Tether release. The other three addresses released on 20 October have not been traced, and whether the traced address remained blacklisted continuously between November 2024 and October 2026 has not been established.


Further Reading


Published by the Zero Trust Network. Research supported by CipherBot and CipherIndex.

Discussion